New Public Management: Is that for better public services?
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
The presence of a state is for the welfare of its citizens. All the basic needs of citizens can be fulfilled and the basic rights of the community can be maintained or even provided by a state. New Public Management (NPM) is a tool that helps a country reform its government institutions. This reform process is a step of change that will lead to the provision of better public services. The results of this study indicate that NPM is only a supporting tool that cannot be drawn a uniform line in its application because in the end the characteristics of a nation and cultural differences greatly affect how a country implements NPM in their institutions.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
References
Abubakar, R. (2021). Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Suka Press.
Callinicos, A. (2003). An anti-capitalist manifesto. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2001). NEW PUBLICMANAGEMENT: The effects of contractualism and devolution on political control. Public Management Review, 3(1), 73-94.
Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami desain metode penelitian kualitatif. Humanika, 21(1), 33-54.
Gurgur, T., & Shah, A. (2005). Localization and Corruption: Panacea or Pandora’s Box? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3486. Washington DC: World Bank.
Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management for All Season? Public Administration, 69, 3-19.
Caron, D. J., & Giauque, D. (2006). Civil servant identity at thecrossroads: new challenges forpublic administrations. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(6), 543-555.
Mauro, S. G., Cinquini, L., & Pianezzi, D. (2021). New Public Management between reality and illusion: Analysing the validity of performance-based budgeting. The British Accounting Review, 53(6).
Horton, S. (2006). New Public Management: Its Impact on Public Servant's Identity. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(6), 533-542.
Lane, J.-E. (2012). The Public Sector: Concepts, Models and Approaches. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Marobela, M. (2008). New public management and the corporatisation of the public sector in peripheral capitalist countries. International Journal of Social Economics, 35, 423-434.
Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Pollitt, C. (2000). Is the emperor in his underwear? An analysis of the impacts of public management reform. Public Management, 2(2), 181-199.
Sugiyono. (2011). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Matei, A., & Antonie, C. (2014). The New Public Management within the Complexity Model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 1125-1129.
Bezes, P., Demaziere, D., Bianic, T. L., Paradeise, C., Normand, R., Benamouzig, D., . . . Evetts, J. (2012). New public management and professionals in the public sector. What new patterns beyond opposition? Sociologie du Travail, 54.
Mathiasen, D. G. (1999). The new public management and its critics. International Public Management Journal, 2(1), 90-111.
Pollitt, C. (1990). Managerialism and the public services : the Anglo-American experience. Cambridge, USA: Basil Blackwell.
Lan, Z., & Rosenbloom, D. H. (1992). Editorial: Public Administration in Transition? Public Administration Review, 52(6), 535-537.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Massachusetts, USA: Addison-Wesley.
Bezes, P., Demaziere, D., Bianic, T. L., Paradeise, C., Normand, R., Benamouzig, D., . . . Evetts, J. (2012). New public management and professionals in the public sector. Sociologie du Travail, 54, 1-52.
Matei, A., & Antonie, C. (2014). The New Public Management within the Complexity Model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences , 109, 1125-1129.