Determination of Management Service Rewards in LMKN
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
The percentage of service fees used as LMKN operational costs often changes, this causes many problems. Particularly in terms of determining performance, as well as in terms of non-compliance with financial and tax reports. This study aims to find the best way to determine service costs that can cover operational activities consistently, as a non-profit institution that is responsible the rights owner’s prosperity. Through the interviews it can be concluded that the fee method which uses tariffs is indeed inconsistent, most of the informants gave suggestions using real costs, where all operational costs must be covered from the royalties collected before being distributed. To maintain the amount, a budget that has been agreed upon by stakeholders must be prepared. The budget includes short-term and long-term budgets, to facilitate activities that are quite expensive. The pattern of determining the compensation for this service can be regulated in the articles of association so that it cannot change along with the term of office of the commissioners at the LMKN. The initial determination of the budget can use historical data calculations with the high and low method, we can find the equation and the size of the budget to make the initial budget. From here we can standardize the form of recording and reporting both financial and tax statements. Performance can also be measured, to what extent the use of funds can generate benefits in accordance with the mission of the institution. The method that is considered appropriate for determining the amount of compensation for services so that it can cover operational costs at the LMKN is to bear the whole (real cost) of the proceeds from collecting royalties without using a percentage limit. The budget that must be made as a limitation of the use of costs. The budget must be approved by all stakeholders, both from the activities offered as well as from the amount of value. The financing method by bearing the real cost will reveal the problems that have occurred so far, the bookkeeping will be more consistent, because costs will only come out based on the approved budget.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
References
Bussinesstech (2022), Pengertian biaya operasional, jenis dan cara perhitungannya, Penulis: Novi Herawati
UU No 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang hak cipta, ditetapkan 16 oketober 2014
D’ Consulting (2019), On line course, Pajak atas Jasa Perantara (Makelar).
Edward James Sinaga, 2020. “Pengelolaan Royalti atas Pengumuman Karya Cipta Lagu dan/atau musik (Royalty on The Management of copyright Songs and Music)” Journal Ilmiah Kebijaksanaan Hukum Volume 14, Nomer 3 November 2020
Granof, Michael H. dan Saleha B. Khumawala. (2019). Government and Not-for- Profit Accounting, Concepts & Practices. USA: John Wiley & Sons.
Griffin, R. W., & Moorhead, G. (2019). Organizational Behavior (11th ed.). SouthWestern.
Gumilar, G. G., Ratnasari, S. L., & Zulkifli. (2020). Organizational Commitments: Organizational Culture, School Head Leadership, School Environment, and Work Satisfaction. Dimensi, 9(1), 48–56.
Hansen, Mowen (2019), Akuntansi Manajerial, Edisi Kedelapan, Jilid I, Terjemahan oleh Deny Arnos Kwary, Jakarta, Penerbit Salemba Empat
Hardianto, G., Erlamsyah, & Nurfahanah. (2019). Hubungan antara Self-efficacy Akademik dengan Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Konselor, 3.
Hidayati, N., & Trisnawati, D. (2022). Pengaruh Kepuasan Kerja Dan Stress Kerja Terhadap Turnover Intentions Karyawan Bag. Marketing Pt. Wahana Sahabat Utama. EKSIS, 11(1).
Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia, Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan (PSAK) No. 45 Pengantar Keuangan Organisasi Nirlaba, Jakarta, 2019.
Jang-Chul, J. (2022). The Effects of Organizational Culture on Self-Efficacy and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Culinary Science and Hospitality Research, 24(3), 121–132. https://doi.org/2466-1023.
Jeremy Kevin dan Rosmita Rasyid ,2021 ”EVALUASI KINERJA ORGANISASI NIRLABA (STUDI KASUS GEREJA BETHEL INDONESIA CITRA 1)”, Journal Multiparadigma Akuntansi, Volume III No. 1/2021 Edisi Januari.
Kaliski, B. S. (2019). Encyclopedia of Business and Finance. Macmillan Publishers.
Kinicki, A., & Fugate, M. (2022). Organizational Behavior: Key Concepts,. Skills and Best Practices. McGraw-Hill.
Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (2019). Organizational behavior (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Lilis Setiawati (2019), Gampang menyusun laporan keuangan organisasi nirlaba, Penerbit: PT Elex Media Komputindo
Maryanne M. Mowen, Don R. Hansen, (2019). Akuntansi Manajerial, Edisi Kedelapan, Jilid I, Terjemahan oleh Deny Arnos Kwary Badan Penerbit: Salemba Empat, 2018.
Peraturan Mentri Hukum dan HAM nomer HKI.2-OT.03.01-03 tahun 2016.
Robbins, S.P. (2019). Organizational Behavior. 15th Edition, Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational Behavior. Pearson.
Saha, S., & Kumar, S. P. (2022). Organizational culture as a moderator between affective commitment and job satisfaction. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 31(2), 184–206. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpsm-03-2017-0078
Samuel, Setiyadi, D., & Tricahyadinata, I. (2020). Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi terhadap Komitmen Organisasional Afektif yang Dimediasi oleh Kepercayaan. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Manajemen (JBM), 16(2), 94–114.
Sarwono, Jonathan. (2012). Path Analysis Untuk Riset Skripsi, Tesis dan. Disertasi. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo Kompas Gramedia.
Siregar, Syofian. 2010. Statistika Deskriptif untuk Penelitian dilengkapi Perhitungan Manual dan Aplikasi SPSS Versi 17. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sitinjak, Tumpal JR & Sugiharto. (2006). LISREL. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Yusuf, M. R., & Syarif, D. (2018). Komitmen Organisasi. Nas Media Pustaka
Zainuddin dan Yustiana Djaelani, 2022. “Pemisahan Semivariable cost sebagai alat bantu perencanaan Laba: Penerapan High low Method dan Least square Method” Journal Trust Riset Akuntasi, Program Studi Akuntansi, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Khairun, Vol 9, No 2 (2022): September 2022