The Effect of Self-Efficacy and Employee Engagement on Employee Performance in Mediation by Digital Literation

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Nov 1, 2020
https://doi.org/10.35335/enrichment.v11i1,%20Novembe.29
Download
PDF Download
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Vol. 11 No. 1, Novembe (2020): Management

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Iman Sidik Nusannas
Tjutju Yuniarsih
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Janah Sojanah
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Disman
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Dhyah Mutmainnah
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Muji Rahayu
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Salman Imbari
STIE DR KHEZ Muttaqien

Abstract

This study aims to determine whether self-efficacy and employee engagement affect the performance of bank frontliners and is mediated by digital literacy. The research was conducted at ten national private bank branch offices in Bandung using a questionnaire distributed to 119 frontliners who handle digital transactions. The research results were processed using SPSS software using the path analysis method. The results showed that self-efficacy and performance had a positive and significant effect on digital literacy, while engagement had no significant effect on digital literacy. The output from the calculation results can be concluded that the efficacy significance value of 0.000 is smaller than 0.05, which can be concluded that there is an effect of self-efficacy (X1) on performance (Y). The efficacy significance value of 0.000 is smaller than 0.05, which can be concluded that there is an effect of engagement (X2) on performance (Y). The significance value of the self-efficacy variable (X1) is 0,000, the engagement variable (X2) is 0.133 and the performance variable (Y) is 0,000, so it can be concluded that only self-efficacy and performance have an effect on digital literacy (Z) while engagement (X2) has a value 0.133 which is greater than 0.05, so it can be concluded that engagement has no significant effect on digital literacy

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Nusannas, I. S., Yuniarsih, T., Sojanah, J., Disman, Mutmainnah, D., Rahayu, M., & Imbari, S. (2020). The Effect of Self-Efficacy and Employee Engagement on Employee Performance in Mediation by Digital Literation. Enrichment : Journal of Management, 11(1, Novembe), 63-67. https://doi.org/10.35335/enrichment.v11i1, Novembe.29

References

[1] Alan M Saks, J. A. G. (2014). Antecedents and Outcomes of Workplace Incivility. In Computational Complexity (Vol. 2, pp. 1–9). https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq
[2] Asare, S., Nicholson, H., & Stein, S. (2017). You can’t ignore us: what role does family play in student engagement and alienation in a Ghanaian university? Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 39(6), 593–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2017.1377968
[3] Bandura, A., Vittorio, G., Pastorelli, C., & Barbaranelli, C. (2006). Self-Efficacy Beliefs as Shapers of Children ? s Aspirations and Career Trajectories. Child Development, 72(1), 187–206Carter, W. R., Nesbit, P. L., Badham, R. J., Parker, S. K., & Sung, L. K. (2018). The effects of employee engagement and self-efficacy on job performance: a longitudinal field study. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(17), 2483–2502. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1244096
[4] Cherian, J., & Jacob, J. (2013). Impact of Self Efficacy on Motivation and Performance of Employees. International Journal of Business and Management, 8(14), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v8n14p80
[5] Garud, R. Raghuram, S., Wiesenfeld, B.(2003). Technology enabled work: The role of self-efficacy in determining telecommuter adjustment and structuring behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(2), 180–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00040-X
[6] Kahn, W. A. (1990). On the formation of molecular terraces. Academy Of Management Journal, 21(18), 8250–8254. https://doi.org/10.1021/la051212i
[7] Lawless, M. W., & Anderson, P. C. (2017). Generational technological change: Effects of innovation and local rivalry on performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1185–1217. https://doi.org/10.2307/256996
[8] Pulakos, E. D., & O’Leary, R. S. (2011). Why Is Performance Management Broken? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4(2), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01315.x
[9] Steinbauer, R., Renn, R. W., Chen, H. S., & Rhew, N. (2018). Workplace ostracism, self-regulation, and job performance: Moderating role of intrinsic work motivation. Journal of Social Psychology, 158(6), 767–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1424110
[10] Belshaw, D.A.J., 2011,What is “Digital Literacy”?,Durham University, United Kingdom
[11] Bernardin, H. J. (2003). Human resource management: An experiential approach. New york: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
[12] Bonner, S. E., & Sprinkle, G. B. (2002). The Effect of Monetary Incentive on Effort and Task Performance: Theories, Evidence and Framework of Research. Accounting, Organization 47 and Society, 27, 303-345.
[13] Bridger, E. (2015). Employee Engagement. United States: Kogan Page.
[14] Dessler, G. (2000). Human Resources Management. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.
[15] Robbins, S. P. (2008). Perilaku Organisasi (Edisi 12). Jakarta: Salemba Empat
[16] Michael Armstrong, S. T. (2014). ARMSTRONG’S HANDBOOK OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PRACTICE. In Progress in Human Geography (Vol. 13). https://doi.org/10.1177/030913258901300105
[17] Sugiyono. 2018. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. Hal 267.
[18] Utama, Made Suyana. 2012. Aplikasi Analisis Kuantitatif, Edisi Keenam. Denpasar: Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Udayana

DB Error: Unknown column 'Array' in 'WHERE'