Institutional Innovation and Co-production as Domestic Waste Handling in Bandung Regency
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
Downloads
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
This article discusses the handling of domestic waste through institutional innovation and co-production as an alternative in reducing and utilizing organic and inorganic waste. Waste in Bandung Regency is a very serious problem, almost all sub-Regencys experience problems in managing waste, even though the local government has created many waste management programs but the waste problem still continues. Therefore, a new concept is needed with reference to the concept of co-production. Co-production is a concept of joint production that exists between the government and the community to produce innovations in waste management through the Thematic Waste Bank. This writing refers to one variable, namely the role of the government, this article is finding various waste handling innovations designed and managed by the local government with a qualitative analysis approach using interviews with informants from the Bandung Regency Environmental Agency. The result of this study is that the local government has carried out various innovations that prioritize broad public participation and community commitment in dealing with the challenges of solid waste issues in Bandung Regency, but these innovations have not been able to significantly reduce waste generation in Bandung Regency. This Thematic Waste Bank Program does not cover all sub-Regencys in Bandung Regency. The result of this study is that the local government has carried out various innovations that prioritize broad public participation and community commitment in dealing with the challenges of solid waste issues in Bandung Regency, but these innovations have not been able to significantly reduce waste generation in Bandung Regency. This Thematic Waste Bank Program does not cover all sub-Regencys in Bandung Regency. The result of this study is that the local government has carried out various innovations that prioritize broad public participation and community commitment in dealing with the challenges of solid waste issues in Bandung Regency, but these innovations have not been able to significantly reduce waste generation in Bandung Regency. This Thematic Waste Bank Program does not cover all sub-Regencys in Bandung Regency.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
References
Brandsen, T., & Honingh, M. (2016). Distinguishing Different Types of Coproduction: A Conceptual Analysis
Based on the Classical Definitions. Review. Public Administratiohttps://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12465
Brandsen, T., Steen, T., & Verschuere, B. (2018). Co-creation and co-production in public services: Urgent issues in practice and research. In Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315204956
Creswell. (2014). An introduction to qualitative. Fifth Edition. Qualitative Research.
Fledderus, J., Brandsen, T., & Honingh, M. (2014). Restoring Trust Through the Co-Production of Public Services: A theoretical elaboration. Public Management Review.https://do i.org/10.1080/ 14719037.20 13.848920
Guerrero, LA, Maas, G., & Hogland, W. (2013). Solid waste management challenges for cities in developing countries. Waste Management.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.09.008
Howlett, M., Kekez, A., & Poocharoen, OO (2017). Understanding Co-Production as a Policy Tool: Integrating New Public Governance and Comparative Policy Theory. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2017.1287445
Johnston, RB (2016). Arsenic and the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. Arsenic Research and Global Sustainability - Proceedings of the 6th International Congress on Arsenic in the Environment, USA 2016, 12–14.https://doi.org/10.1201/b20466-7
Klijn, EH, Edelenbos, J., & Steijn, B. (2010). Trust in governance networks: Its impacts on outcomes. Administration and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399710362716
Li, H. (2020). Communication for Coproduction: Increasing Information Credibility to Fight the Coronavirus. American Review of Public Administration, 50(6–7), 692 697.https://doi.org/10.1177 /0275074020942104
Lu, H., & Sidortsov, R. (2019). Sorting out a problem: A co-production approach to household waste management in Shanghai, China. Waste Management, 95, 271– 277.https://doi.org /10.1016/j.wasman. 2019.06.020
Nabatchi, T., Sancino, A., & Sicilia, M. (2017). Varieties of Participation in Public Services: The Who, When, and What of Coproduction. Public Administration Review.https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12765
Steen, T., & Brandsen, T. (2020). Coproduction during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic: Will It Last? Public Administration Review, 80(5), 851–855.https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13258
Sulistyani, AT, & Wulandari, Y. (2017). The Process of Community Empowerment in Sitimulyo Village, Piyungan Regency, Bantul Regency in the Establishment of an Independent Waste Management Group (KPSM). Indonesian Journal of Community Engagement, 2(2), 146–162.https://doi.org/10. 22146/jpkm.27024
Tacoli, C. (2012). United Nations Population Fund Urbanization and Emerging Population Issues Urbanization, Gender and Urban Poverty: Paid Work and Unpaid carework in The City. In Africa (Issue March).
Parks, RB, Baker, PC, Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., Percy, SL, Vandivort, MB, Whitaker, GP, & Wilson, R. (1981). Consumers as Co-producers of Public Services: Somes Economic and Institutional Considerations. Policy Studies Journal.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1981.tb01208.x
Pires, A., Martinho, G., & Chang, N. Bin. (2011). Solid waste management in European countries: A review of systems analysis techniques. In the Journal of Environmental Management.https://doi.org/10.1016
Voorberg, WH, Bekkers, VJJM, & Tummers, LG (2015). A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.930505
Wilson, DC, Rodic., Scheinberg, A., Velis, CA & alabaster, G. (2012). Comparative analysis of solid waste management in 20 cities