Analysis of Work Environment and Work Stress on Work Productivity PT. MSM


Togar Naibaho
Winfrontstein Naibaho


 The purpose of this study was to determine the effect the work environment and work stress on work productivity at PT.MSM either partially or simultaneously. The method used is descriptive explorative. The population in this study were all employees who totaled 40 people at PT.MSM Medan. Because the total population of less than 100 people, the number of samples taken throughout the population (saturated sample) as many as 40 people. Data analysis techniques using multiple linear regression analysis, the determinant test, F test and t test. Results of the study resulted in an equation an equation: Prod= 2,092 + 0,965LinKER - 0,433Stres. Test Results Adjusted R Square obtained a value of 0.963, this figure illustrates that the variation of the rise and fall of labor productivity variable value of 96,3% is determined by the work environment variables and work stress while the remaining3,7% is influenced by variables that did not participate in the research study such as compensation, motivation and others. Simultaneously working environment and work stress were significant effect on work productivity at PT.MSM Medan, is evident from the test results simultaneously obtained value of F (548,07) with a significant level of 0.00 is smaller than alpha (0.05). Partially, the working environment have a significant effect on work productivity at PT.MSM Medan, where the partial results obtained for the work environment variable is 31,966 with significance level (0.000) is smaller than 0.05, while work stress has significant effect too on productivity known work of the partial test results obtained yield was -8,646 with significance level (0.000) smaller than 0.05.


How to Cite
Naibaho, T., & Naibaho, W. (2022). Analysis of Work Environment and Work Stress on Work Productivity PT. MSM. Enrichment : Journal of Management, 12(2), 1452-1462. Retrieved from


N. Lee, B. K. Lee, S. Jeong, G. Y. Yi, and J. Shin, “Work environments and exposure to hazardous substances in Korean tire manufacturing,” Saf. Health Work, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 130–139, 2012, doi: 10.5491/SHAW.2012.3.2.130.
E. Getaneh Mekonen, B. Shetie Workneh, M. Seid Ali, B. Fentie Abegaz, M. Wassie Alamirew, and A. Aemro Terefe, “Prevalence of work-related stress and its associated factors among bank workers in Gondar city, Northwest Ethiopia: A multi-center cross-sectional study,” Int. J. Africa Nurs. Sci., vol. 16, p. 100386, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijans.2021.100386.
C. Kusoski, S. Polley, and J. Kennerly-Shah, “Coronavirus 2019 work-from-home productivity of inpatient and infusion pharmacists at a comprehensive cancer center,” J. Am. Pharm. Assoc., pp. 1–6, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.11.021.
N. Hoboubi, A. Choobineh, F. Kamari Ghanavati, S. Keshavarzi, and A. Akbar Hosseini, “The Impact of Job Stress and Job Satisfaction on Workforce Productivity in an Iranian Petrochemical Industry,” Saf. Health Work, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 67–71, 2017, doi: 10.1016/
N. Khamisa, K. Peltzer, D. Ilic, and B. Oldenburg, “Effect of personal and work stress on burnout, job satisfaction and general health of hospital nurses in South Africa,” Heal. SA Gesondheid, vol. 22, pp. 252–258, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.hsag.2016.10.001.
A. Väänänen, E. Anttila, J. Turtiainen, and P. Varje, “Formulation of work stress in 1960-2000: Analysis of scientific works from the perspective of historical sociology,” Soc. Sci. Med., vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 784–794, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.04.014.
S. Demir, E. Abou-Jaoude, and M. Kumral, “Cognitive work analysis to comprehend operations and organizations in the mining industry,” Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 605–609, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2017.05.008.
K. R. Parkes, “Work environment, overtime and sleep among offshore personnel,” Accid. Anal. Prev., vol. 99, pp. 383–388, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.11.022.
M. M. Noorizan, N. F. Afzan, A. Z. Norfazlina G., and A. S. S. Akma, “The Moderating Effects of Motivation on Work Environment and Training Transfer: A Preliminary Analysis,” Procedia Econ. Financ., vol. 37, no. 16, pp. 158–163, 2016, doi: 10.1016/s2212-5671(16)30107-1.
N. M. Suki, N. M. Suki, and N. S. Azman, “Impacts of Corporate Social Responsibility on the Links Between Green Marketing Awareness and Consumer Purchase Intentions,” Procedia Econ. Financ., vol. 37, no. 16, pp. 262–268, 2016, doi: 10.1016/s2212-5671(16)30123-x.
S. Wadood, B. Gharleghi, and B. Samadi, “Influence of Change in Management in Technological Enterprises,” Procedia Econ. Financ., vol. 37, no. 16, pp. 129–136, 2016, doi: 10.1016/s2212-5671(16)30103-4.
N. M. A. Ghani, N. S. N. M. Yunus, and N. S. Bahry, “Leader’s Personality Traits and Employees Job Performance in Public Sector, Putrajaya,” Procedia Econ. Financ., vol. 37, no. 16, pp. 46–51, 2016, doi: 10.1016/s2212-5671(16)30091-0.
G. M. Ling, Y. S. Fern, L. K. Boon, and T. S. Huat, “Understanding Customer Satisfaction of Internet Banking: A Case Study In Malacca,” Procedia Econ. Financ., vol. 37, no. 16, pp. 80–85, 2016, doi: 10.1016/s2212-5671(16)30096-x.
A. H. A. Halim and A. R. M. Mokhtar, “Creating Memorable Visitor Experiences by Assessing the Satisfaction Level and Behavioural Consequences of Attendees,” Procedia Econ. Financ., vol. 37, no. 16, pp. 1–6, 2016, doi: 10.1016/s2212-5671(16)30084-3.
R. I. S. Munir and R. A. Rahman, “Determining Dimensions of Job Satisfaction Using Factor Analysis,” Procedia Econ. Financ., vol. 37, no. 16, pp. 488–496, 2016, doi: 10.1016/s2212-5671(16)30156-3.
M. A. Jaffar and R. Musa, “Determinants of Attitude and Intention towards Islamic Financing Adoption among Non-Users,” Procedia Econ. Financ., vol. 37, no. 16, pp. 227–233, 2016, doi: 10.1016/s2212-5671(16)30118-6.
A. Mat, A. M. Said, E. A. Bakar, N. L. Kori, and Z. A. Munir, “Determining the Income Differences and Complaint Behavior Among Automobile Repairs and Service Consumers in Shah Alam, Malaysia,” Procedia Econ. Financ., vol. 37, no. 16, pp. 21–26, 2016, doi: 10.1016/s2212-5671(16)30087-9.