The Effect Of International Accreditation On The Interest Of Students With Intellectual Capital Disclosure As A Moderation Variable At State University In Indonesia; Evidence From 4ICU 2022


Pratiwi Fitri Wijayanti
Dewie Tri Wijayati Wardoyo
Andre Dwijanto Witjaksono


This study aims to empirically examine the effect of international accredited study programs on student interest and the interaction of ICD as a moderating variable on the effect of accredited study programs on student interest. In addition, researchers show the practice of intellectual capital disclosure at the best state universities in Indonesia, the 4ICU version in 2022. The data is taken from the official website of universities in Indonesia. The results showed that from 46 samples of universities, there was no university that fully disclosed the Intellectual Capital indicator. In addition to human capital information, universities tend to report relational capital which indirectly describes the achievements and advantages of the university The results of the PLS test show that international accredited study programs have a significant effect on student interest and ICD does not moderate the relationship between international accredited study programs and student interests.


How to Cite
Wijayanti, P. F., Wardoyo, D. T. W., & Witjaksono, A. D. (2022). The Effect Of International Accreditation On The Interest Of Students With Intellectual Capital Disclosure As A Moderation Variable At State University In Indonesia; Evidence From 4ICU 2022. Enrichment : Journal of Management, 12(2), 1696-1705. Retrieved from


[1] Amodu, L., Omojola, O., Okorie, N., Adeyeye, B., & Adesina, E. (2019). Potentials of Internet of Things for effective public relations activities: Are professionals ready? Cogent Business and Management, 6(1), 1–15.
[2] Bezhani, I. (2010). Intellectual capital reporting at UK universities. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11(2), 179–207.
[3] Bisogno, M., Citro, F., & Tommasetti, A. (2014). Disclosure of university websites. Evidence from Italian data. Global Business and Economics Review, 16(4), 452–471.
[4] Bodnar, C. A., Jadeja, S., & Barrella, E. (2020). Creating a master entrepreneurial mindset concept map. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2020-June.
[5] Bontis, N. (2001). Assessing knowledge assets: A review of the models used to measure intellectual capital. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(1), 41–60.
[6] Bratianu, C. (2014). Intellectual capital of the European universities. Handbook of Research on Trends in European Higher Education Convergence, 24–43.
[7] Brender, N., Yzeiraj, B., & Dupuy, F. (2017). Risk and accountability: Drivers for change in network governance. The case of school restaurants governance in a Swiss city. Cogent Business and Management, 4(1), 1–13.
[8] Cañibano M., L., & Sanchez, P. (2008). Intellectual Capital Management and Reporting in Universities and Research Institutions. Studies of Applied Economics, 26(2), 7–26.
[9] Casanueva, C., & Gallego, Á. (2010). Social capital and individual innovativeness in university research networks. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 12(1), 105–117.
[10] Chang, Y. shan, Lin, K. jun, & Tu, T. wen. (2016). The Impact of AACSB Accreditation on Business School Students in Taiwan. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(4), 615–625.
[11] Commission, E. (2006). Reporting Intellectual Capital to Augment Research, Development and Innovation in SMEs.
[12] Cricelli, L., Greco, M., Grimaldi, M., & Llanes Dueñas, L. P. (2018). Intellectual capital and university performance in emerging countries: Evidence from Colombian public universities. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(1), 71–95.
[13] Deegan, C. (2014). Financial Accounting Theory. Sydney: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
[14] Elliott, C. (2013). The impact of AACSB accreditation: A multiple case study of Canadian university business schools. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 30(3), 203–218.
[15] Fathony, M., & Ulum, I. (2018). University’ Characteristics, Accreditation Status, and Intellectual Capital Disclosure : Evidence From Indonesia. International Journal of Economics and Research, 9(6), 23–36.
[16] Fleseriu, C., Duma, F. S., Nistor, I. A., & Păun, D. (2020). The sustainability of international accreditations and their impact on students’ choices in selecting the universities. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(16).
[17] Gobel, I. C., Juanda, A., Ulum, I., & Mudrifah, M. (2020). Determinants of Intellectual Capital Disclosure in Non-Vocational Higher Education in Indonesia. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 21(2).
[18] Kamal, B., & Rahmadiane, G. D. (2017). Pengaruh Persepsi, Akreditasi Prodi, Dan Promosi Terhadap Keputusan Memilih Program Studi Akuntansi Pada Politeknik Harapan Bersama Bahri. Jurnal Inspirasi Binsis & Manajemen, 1(9), 145–158.
[19] Kemenristekdikti. (2020). Roadmap Akreditasi/ Sertifikasi Internasional Program Studi di Perguruan Tinggi Indonesia. In Direktorat Penjaminan Mutu Direktorat Jenderal Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi 2019 (p. 86).
[20] Kuralová, K., & Margarisová, K. (2016). Intellectual Capital Disclosure At Czech Public Universities in Relation. 64(6), 1989–1998.
[21] Leitner, K. H. (2002). Intellectual capital reporting for universities: Conceptual background and application for Austrian universities. Research Evaluation, 13(2), 129–140.
[22] Leitner, K. H. (2004). Intellectual capital reporting for universities: Conceptual background and application for Austrian universities. Research Evaluation, 13(2), 129–140.
[23] Liu, D., & Morgan, W. J. (2016). Students’ Decision-Making About Postgraduate Education at G University in China: The Main Factors and the Role of Family and of Teachers. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(2), 325–335.
[24] Manes Rossi, F., Nicolò, G., & Tartaglia Polcini, P. (2018). New trends in intellectual capital reporting: Exploring online intellectual capital disclosure in Italian universities. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(4), 814–835.
[25] Moussa, M., McMurray, A., & Muenjohn, N. (2018). Innovation in public sector organisations. Cogent Business and Management, 5(1), 1–12.
[26] Najim, N. A., Al-naimi, M. A., Alnaji, L., & Faculty, B. (2012). Impact of Intellectual Capital on Realizing University Goals in a Sample ample of Jordanian Universities. 4(14), 153–162.
[27] Ngoma, M., & Ntale, P. D. (2019). Word of mouth communication: A mediator of relationship marketing and customer loyalty. Cogent Business and Management, 6(1).
[28] Nikolaj Bukh, P., Nielsen, C., Gormsen, P., & Mouritsen, J. (2005). Disclosure of information on intellectual capital in Danish IPO prospectuses. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(6), 713–732.
[29] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (1999). Guidelines and instructions for OECD symposium. International Symposium Measuring and Reporting Intellectual Capital: Experience, Issues, and Prospects, 0, 1–21.
[30] Pérez, S. E., & Sánchez, M. P. (2007). Governing the university of the 21st century: intellectual capital as a tool for strategic management. Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, July.
[31] Purnomosidhi, B. (2005). Analisis Empiris Terhadap Diterminan Praktik Pengungkapan Modal Intelektual Pada Perusahaan Publik di BEJ. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 6(2), 1–25.
[32] Ramírez Córcoles, Y., & Tejada Ponce, Á. (2013). Cost-benefit analysis of intellectual capital disclosure: University stakeholders’ view. Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review, 16(2), 106–117.
[33] Ramírez, Y., & Gordillo, S. (2014). Recognition and measurement of intellectual capital in Spanish universities. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15(1), 173–188.
[34] Ramírez, Y., Lorduy, C., & Rojas, J. A. (2007). Intellectual capital management in Spanish universities. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(4), 732–748.
[35] Rina Fariana. (2016). Analisis Pengaruh Karakteristik Perusahaan Terhadap Pengungkapan Intellectual Capital Pada Official Website Perusahaan Jasa Keuangan Yang Go Publik. Majalah Ekonomi, 1411, 177–190.
[36] Roberts, R. W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), 595–612.
[37] Sáchez, M. P., Elena, S., & Castrillo, R. (2009). Intellectual capital dynamics in universities: A reporting model. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10(2), 307–324.
[38] Sangiorgi, D., & Siboni, B. (2017). The disclosure of intellectual capital in Italian universities: What has been done and what should be done. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(2), 354–372.
[39] Sawarjuwono, T., & Kadir, A. P. (2003). Intellectual Capital: Perlakuan, Pengukuran Dan Pelaporan (Sebuah Library Research). Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 5(1), 35–57.
[40] Secundo, G., Lombardi, R., & Dumay, J. (2018). Intellectual capital in education. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(1), 2–9.
[41] Secundo, G., Margherita, A., Elia, G., & Passiante, G. (2010). Intangible assets in higher education and research: Mission, performance or both? Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11(2), 140–157.
[42] Suwardjono. (2014). Accounting Theory: Financial Reporting Engineering.
[43] Ulum, Ihyaul. (2012). Konstruksi Komponen Intellectual Capital untuk Perguruan Tinggi di Indonesia. Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 2(2), 251–262.
[44] Ulum, Ihyaul, Harviana, R. R., Zubaidah, S., & Jati, A. W. (2019). Intellectual capital disclosure and prospective student interest: an Indonesian perspectives. Cogent Business and Management, 6(1).
[45] Ulum, Ihyaul, & Novianty, N. (2012). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Pengungkapan Intellectual Capital Pada Official Website Perguruan Tinggi Indonesia. Jurnal Dan Prosiding SNA - Simposium Nasional Akuntansi, 15, 1–22.
[46] Williams, S. M. (2001). Is intellectual capital performance and disclosure. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 192–203.