Causality of Efficiency, Effectiveness and Independence to Financial Performance (Tidore City Case Study)
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
Downloads
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
The purpose of this study is: 1) To find out If Independence affects the financial performance of the government of Tidore Islands City. 2) To find out If Harmony affects the financial performance of the government of Tidore Islands City. 3). To find out if Efficiency affects the financial performance of the government of Tidore Islands City. 4) To find out If Effectiveness affects the financial performance of the government in Tidore Islands City? with analysis methods using financial ratio analysis tools. The results of this study suggest that: 1) The ratio of regional independence has not been able to optimize pad to finance regional development. Public awareness and participation in the payment of taxes and levies is also one of the things that causes pad produced by the Tidore City Government to be few and unreliable to finance development. In addition, there are also differences in the implementation of government and loans as well as assistance from the center and total revenue in each region and the realization of spending in each region. To overcome this, local governments must be able to optimize revenues from their existing revenue potential, initiatives and willingness to regional government is needed in an effort to improve PAD, such as the service of potential sector BOM. 2) Judging from the results of the analysis of the ratio of effectiveness of good performance in terms of realizing the planned PAD. Investigation in Tidore City, its financial management has also been effective. 3). Judging from the results of the analysis of the Efficiency Ratio that the Financial Performance of the Tidore City Government has not been efficient. 4). The ratio of harmony is the allocation of Operating Expenditures greater than the Capital Expenditure.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
References
[2] Abdul Halim. (2008). Akuntansi Sektor Publik.Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
[3] Abdul Halim. (2014). Perpajakan:konsep, Aplikasi, Contoh dan Studi Kasus,. Jakarta:Salemba Empat.
[4] Agustin, F. (2007). PENGUKURAN KINERJA KEUANGAN DAERAH (Studi pada Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Blitar) (Doctoral dissertation, University of Muhammadiyah Malang).
[5] Assiddiqi, Z., Azizah, S. Y., Nazar, L., Rohmah, A. F., Rahmawan, N., & Azmi, H. (2014). First Indonesian record of Pectoral Sandpiper Calidris melanotos. Kukila, 17(2), 136-138.
[6] Darise, N. (2008). Akuntansi Keuangan Daaerah.Jakarta: PT Indeks.
[7] Fahmi, I. (2012). .’’Analisis Kinerja Keuangan’’,. Bandung: Alfabeta.
[8] Halim, A. (2004). Bunga Rampai Manajemen Keuangan Daerah Penerbit UPP AMP YKPN. Yogayakarta.
[9] Halim, A. (2007). Halim, Abdul. 2007. Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah. : UPP STIM YKPPN. Yogyakarta.
[10] Mardiasmo. (2009). Akuntansi Sektor Publik., Andi.Yogyakarta.
[11] Moehar, D. (2002). Pengantar Ilmu Pertanian. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.
[12] Munir. (2004). Manejemen Sumber Daya Manusia.Erlangga, Jakarta.
[13] Nazir, M. (1988). MetodePenelitian.Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
[14] Peraturan mentri dalam negeri (Permendagri) No 13 tahun 2006.. Pedoman pengelolaan daerah.
[15] Peraturan mentri dalam negeri (Permendagri) Nomor 21 Tahun 2011.. APBD.
[16] Peraturan mentri dalam negeri (Permendagri) Nomor 59 Tahun 2007. (2007). Pedoman Pengelolaan Keuangan DAerah.
[17] P. mentri dalam negeri (Permendagri) No 29 T. 2002 Tentang Pedoman Pengurusan, Pertanggungjawaban, Dan pengawasan Keuangan daerah.
[18] Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 58 Tahun 2005. Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah.
[19] Sucipto. (2003). Penilaian Kinerja Keuangan.”Jurnal Akuntansi.Universitas Sumatera Utara Medan.
[20] Sumarjo, H. (2010). Pengaruh karakteristik pemerintah daerah terhadap kinerja keuangan pemerintah daerah.
[21] Tahun, U.-U. N. 33. (2004). tentang Perimbangan Keuangan Pusat dan daerah.
[22] Tarmizi, R., Khairudin, K., & Jayadi, A. (2014). Analisis kinerja keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Kota Bandar Lampung sebelum dan setelah memperoleh opini WTP. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 5(2).
[23] Undang-Undang No 1 Tahun 2003. (2003). Pemekaran Wilayah.
[24] Undang-Undang No 32 Tahun 2004. (2004). Pemenrintah daerah (PEMDA).
[25] Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 1999. (n.d.). Perimbangan keuangan antara pemerintah pusat dan daerah.
[26] Undang Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 1999. (n.d.). perimbangan keuangan pusat dan daerah.
[27] Wonda, W. (2016). Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Dalam Masa Otonomi Daerah Kabupaten Nabire Provinsi Papua. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 4(3).