The role of leader's morality and organizational conduciveness in preventing fraud in the public sector

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Etik Ipda Riyani
Eka Wirajuang Daurrohmah
Pesi Suryani

Abstract

Fraud is a significant issue in public administration, undermining trust, and efficiency in government operations. In Indonesia, particularly in the Bengkulu Provincial Government, instances of fraud have raised concerns about the effectiveness of existing prevention mechanisms. Understanding the factors that influence fraud prevention is crucial for improving governance and fostering accountability. This study aims to explore the role of leaders' morality and organizational conduciveness in preventing fraud within the Bengkulu Provincial Government. Using a qualitative approach with a descriptive phenomenology method, this research involved in-depth interviews with employees from various government institutions in Bengkulu Province. Data were collected through purposive sampling and analyzed using content analysis with Nvivo software. The research results show that high leader morality and a conducive organizational culture play a significant role in preventing fraud. Leaders with integrity create an ethical and transparent work environment, while an organizational culture that supports open communication, teamwork, and a strong internal control system helps reduce the risk of fraud. The organization's commitment to implementing strict rules and providing consultation spaces also contributes to strengthening fraud prevention mechanisms

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Riyani, E. I., Daurrohmah, E. W., & Suryani, P. (2024). The role of leader’s morality and organizational conduciveness in preventing fraud in the public sector. Enrichment : Journal of Management, 14(4), 705-711. https://doi.org/10.35335/enrichment.v14i4.2043

References

Bazeley, P. A. T. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: Practical Strategies. In Sage.
Charli, M. S., Eshete, S. K., & Debela, K. L. (2022). Learning How Research Design Methods Work: A Review of Creswell’s Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5901
Clinard, M. B., & Cressey, D. R. (1954). Other People’s Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement. American Sociological Review, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.2307/2087778
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design Qualitative quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Research Design Qualitative Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. https://doi.org/10.3109/08941939.2012.723954
Daurrohmah, E. W., Urumsah, D., & Nustini, Y. (2022). Efektifkah Audit Forensik Dengan Dukungan Whistle-Blowing Digunakan Untuk Mendeteksi Suap? Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v7i2.795
Dorasamy, N. (2010). The impact of the global crisis on ethical leadership: A case study of the South African public sector. African Journal of Business Management, 4(10).
Fatmawati, N. I. (2017, June 21). Kronologi OTT Kasus Suap Gubernur Bengkulu. DetikNews.
Flood, J. (2020). Consideration of fraud in a financial statement audit. In Wiley Practitioner’s Guide to GAAS 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119596042.ch5
Free, C., & Murphy, P. R. (2015). The ties that bind: The decision to co-offend in fraud. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12063
Free, C. W., & Murphy, P. R. (2013). The Ties that Bind: The Decision to Co-Offend in Fraud. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2275750
Hajipoor, F. (2020). The Importance of Ethics and Ethical Leadership in Public Sector Accountants. In Journal of Health Accounting.
Lumban Gaol, L., Suryani, P., & Zuhroh, S. (2024). Kebijakan Pemerintah Sebagai Katalis. Jurnal Akademi Akuntansi Indonesia Padang, 4(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.31933/yzx4hq04
Ma’arif, M., Suryani, P., & Publik, A. K. (2023). Enrichment: Journal of Management Journal homepage: www.enrichment.iocspublisher.org SAKTI application in strengthening accountability and transparency in financial management at BNN South Lampung Regency. In Enrichment: Journal of Management (Vol. 13, Issue 4).
Mashitoh, H., Daurrohmah, E. W., Inan, D. I., & Firman, A. (2023). The Analysis of Fraud in Perspective of Fraud Pentagon Theory: An Empirical Study in Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Terapan Indonesia, 06, 2–107. https://doi.org/10.18196/jati.v6i2.1
Milena, Z. R., Dainora, G., & Alin, S. (2012). Qualitative Research Methods: A Comparison between Focus-Group and In-depth Interview. Research Paper in Economics, 1279–1283.
Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Muktiyanto, A., Dwiyani, R., Hartati, N., Perdana, H. D., & Possumah, B. T. (2019). Control Combating Corruption: A Governance Model from Indonesians’ Perspective. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 54(5). https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.54.5.21
Murphy, P. R., & Free, C. (2016). Broadening the fraud triangle: Instrumental climate and fraud. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 28(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-51083
Ngoepe-Ntsoane, M. J., & Webb, W. N. (2020). Ethical Leadership: Resolving the Failure of Public Policies in Corruption Prevention. Journal of Contemporary Management, 17(se2). https://doi.org/10.35683/jcm20_3.134
Okoye, E.I. & Gbegi, D. O. (2021). Forensic Accounting : A Tool for Fraud Detection and Prevention in the public sector. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 3(3).
Oladimeji, K. A., & Abdulkareem, A. K. (2023). Ethical Leadership and Employee Performance in the Public Sector: The Mediating Effects of Motivation and Satisfaction. Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.v13i2.14903
Ramadhan, G., Suryani, P., Lumban Gaol, L., & Publik, A. K. (2024). Enrichment: Journal of Management The implementation of digital-based accounting for fraud prevention at PNM Mekaar Syariah. In Enrichment: Journal of Management (Vol. 14, Issue 1).
Rustiarini, N. W., T, S., Nurkholis, N., & Andayani, W. (2019). Why people commit public procurement fraud? The fraud diamond view. In Journal of Public Procurement (Vol. 19, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-02-2019-0012
Sa’id, S. U., & Abas Azmi, K. S. (2022). Challenges of combating fraudulent practices: evidence from Nigerian public sector. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-04-2020-0075
Shakeel, F., Kruyen, P. M., & Van Thiel, S. (2020). Ethical leadership: A structured review into construct, measurement, public sector context and effects. International Journal of Public Leadership, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPL-09-2019-0060
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Penerbit Alfabeta.
Suryani, P. (2019). Pengaruh Partisipasi Publik, Akuntabilitas, Transparansi Dan Integritas Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Kabupaten Bengkulu Tengah. Jurnal Fairness, 9(1), 33–44.
Suryani, P., Ginting, R., & Daurrohmah, E. W. (2023). Menguak Makna Akuntabilitas dalam Mengelak Lika-Liku Fraud: Studi Fenomenologi pada Tourist Village. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi & Perpajakan (JRAP), 10(2). https://doi.org/10.35838/jrap.2023.010.02.23
Wang, Z., Ren, S., Chadee, D., & Chen, Y. (2024). Employee Ethical Silence Under Exploitative Leadership: The Roles of Work Meaningfulness and Moral Potency. Journal of Business Ethics, 190(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05405-0